The Journal of the World Book Community 21, no. Many historians carry with us a vague pecking order of scholarly publishers, assuming that those near the top exercise more selective editorial filtering than those below.
By sharing ideas in our writing and by reflecting on and responding to the writing of others, we contribute to the creation of intellectual communities.
The e-book formats currently found most commonly in academic libraries allow users to flip through images of book pages on our browsers, search the text, and copy passages into our notes, but do not alter the one-way flow of scholarly communication from author to audience.
Many historians carry with us a vague pecking order of scholarly publishers, assuming that those near the top exercise more selective editorial filtering than those below.
Our model uses a combination of open-source WordPress tools to deliver what historians seek: At the same time, we wondered whether we could find a journal or press that embraced our ideal of sharing our scholarship on the open web.
How do we expect them to develop their skills as writers, particularly of dissertations and books, without openly sharing and comparing our writing processes? All of our software is freely available, and we were able to modify portions to fit our specific needs.
As a discipline, we favor book-length monographs over the article-based publishing traditions of the social sciences.
In addition to what for many of us is uncompensated time, many historians commonly pay their own research travel, photocopying, copyright permissions, and indexing costs. Unlike proprietary models, no subscription fee or password is required to view or comment on our scholarship.
Even when we do share shorter works, such as a chapter in a collection of essays, the results can be disappointing. We historians tend to research and write in isolation. With open-web publishing, authors can link to any source that is freely available on the Internet.
The most principled reason for academics to publish is to share and engage with the ideas of others, as part of a larger process of enriching the body of knowledge. Publishing to Share Ideas The most principled reason for academics to publish is to share ideas and engage with the ideas of others, as part of a larger process of enriching the body of knowledge.
In turn, publishers sell faculty scholarship back to our academic libraries, and charge them a price for the right to lend out print copies or disseminate digital copies on proprietary databases. Our Proposal We propose Writing History in the Digital Age as one but certainly not the only model for rethinking publishing in ways that preserve our scholarly values.
While we aspire toward this noble goal in Writing History in the Digital Age, we also recognize the pressures for professional advancement faced particularly by newer scholars entering the field. All of our software is freely available, and we were able to modify portions to fit our specific needs.
First, the book is born digital, meaning that we published it on the web in stages, as it developed, and relied on collaborative web tools for contributors to share ideas, drafts, and comments. Writing is our shared craft, the glue that unites our profession, but we tend to be private about it.
Would that make it count more, or less?We hope Writing History in the Digital Age will inspire others to join in rethinking how and why and even what we publish, all in the service of improving both our scholarship and others’ access to it. The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens e-books currently make up between 15 and 20 percent of all.
WRITING: A MANUAL FOR THE DIGITAL AGE, BRIEF 2nd Edition is the rhetorical handbook for composing in the 21st century. Blakesley and Hoogeveen place students' writing front and center with an innovative page format that keeps students' attention focused on their own writing and on activities/5(4).
and represent the future of reading in this digital age, critics explain that reading on a screen is an unpleasant experience that has, and will continue to, stymie the growth of e-books (Weeks, ).
The book Digital Paper: A Manual for Research and Writing with Library and Internet Materials, E-book $ to $ About E-books ISBN: poor writing skills, and the decline of library research in the digital age.
We are fortunate that Andrew Abbott comes to the rescue with a manual for writing a research paper using the tools of the. Similarly, Ferris Jabr, writing in for Scientific American, offered this sympathetic summary of the digital skeptic’s case against screen-based reading: “Even so, evidence from laboratory experiments, polls and consumer reports indicates that modern screens and e-readers fail to adequately recreate certain tactile experiences of.Download